Skip to main content

Angel flight

Angel flight is a term used by group of people whose members are provided with free air transportation,  because they are in need with free medical treatment far from home. The transportation of passengers are done by volunteer pilots using their own general aviation aircraft.

History of angel flight 
The first two organisation to be termed "angel flight" was founded in the year 1983. The first organisation was formed in Santa Monica, California known as the "Angel flight of California (presently Angel Flight West)". The second was formed in Atlanta, Georgia and was called "Angel Flight Soars"

Accidents and incidents

  • On 15th August, 2011 a Piper PA-28 Cherokee conducting an angel flight crashed in rural Victoria, Australia.
  • On May 24, 2013 an angel flight crashed into a pond in Ephratah, New York.
  • On June 28, 2017 a TBIO Tobago serving an angel flight crashed into a terrain near MT Gambier heading to Adelaide.


Pilots 
The pilots of angel flight are people who volunteer their skills, time, funds etc. in helping transporting passengers of the angel flight. Some of these pilots, uses their own plane or rather related planes to help the angel flight organisations.
Despite being a volunteer service, pilots must possess certain flight experience requirements before they are allowed to transport any passengers of the angel flight program.
Some of the reasons why pilots engage themselves to angel flight include:

  • They enjoy flying 
  • They think providing charity is more constructive
Countries where angel flight exist

  • United States 
  • Europe 
  • Australia 
  • Canada 


Sponsors of Air Care Alliance 

  • AOPA foundation 
  • Wolf Aviation Fund 
  • Operation Angel Plane 
  • Signature Flight Support 
  • NBAA
  • Angel flight 
  • Alliance For Aviation Across America 
  • AOPA


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Schrodinger equation as a law in physics

The unified theory of wave-particle duality has been used to derive the Schrödinger equations. The Schrodinger equations are generally accepted, by postulate rather than derivation, to be laws of physics. The Schrodinger equations provide a basis for analyzing many kinds of systems (molecular, atomic, and nuclear) in a particular inertial reference frame. The success of the Schrödinger equations constitutes a basis for accepting them, their derivations, and the unified theory of wave-particle duality which makes such derivations possible. This acceptance is completely justified in the favored inertial reference frame. In accord with the principle of relativity, all physical laws must be the same in all inertial reference frames, i.e., all physical laws must be Lorentz invariant. Recall, the relationship: $$\nabla^{2} \psi = \frac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial t^{2}}$$ ...........(1) Equ (1) is Lorentz invariant and reduces, by means of the procedure presented in the previou
Post a Comment
Read more

Maxwell first equation

The Maxwell first equation in electrostatics is called the Gauss law in electrostatics. Statement:  It states that the total electric flux \(\psi_E\) passing through a closed hypothetical surface is equal to \(\frac{1}{\epsilon_0}\) enclosed by the surface. Integral Form: $$\phi_E = \int E.ds = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}$$ $$\int D.ds = q$$ where, $$D = \epsilon_0 E = displacement-vector$$ Let the change be distributed over a volume v and \(\rho\) be the volume charge density. Hence, $$q = \int \rho dv$$ Therefore; $$\int D.ds = \int_{v} \rho dv$$ .........(1) Equ(1) is the integral form of Maxwell first law Differential form: Apply Gauss divergence theorem to the L.H.S of equ(1) from surface integral to volume integral. $$\int D.ds = \int (\nabla.D)dv$$ Substituting this equation to equ(1) $$\int(\nabla.D)dv = \int_{v} \rho dv$$ As two volume integrals are equal only if their integrands are equal. Thus; $$\nabla.D = \rho v$$ ............(2) Equ(2) is the differe
Post a Comment
Read more

Auxiliary time dependent Schrodinger equation

Recall the relationship: $$\phi(t) = C_+ exp[-i(\frac{E}{\hbar})t] + C_- exp[i(\frac{E}{\hbar})t]$$ .............(1) Recall, from the present special case: $$C_+ = 0$$ ........(2) Substitute equ (2) into equ (1), we have that: $$\phi(t) = C_- exp[i(\frac{E}{\hbar})t]$$ .......(3) Also,  recall the relationship: $$\Psi(r,t) = \psi(r) \phi(t)$$ ..........(4) Substitute equ (3) into equ (4): $$\Psi(r,t) = C_- exp \psi (r)  [i(\frac{E}{\hbar})t]$$ ..............(5) Equ (5) can be differentiated with respect to t, and by rearranging we have: $$\Psi(r,t) = -i(\frac{\hbar}{E}) \frac{d \Psi (r, t)}{dt}$$ ..............(6) Recall the relationship: $$-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \nabla^{2} \Psi(r,t) + V(r) \Psi(r,t) = E \Psi(r,t)$$ ...........(7) Substituting equ (6) into the right hand side of equ (7) we have: $$-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \nabla^{2} \Psi(r,t) + V(r) \Psi(r,t) = i\hbar \frac{d \Psi(r,t)}{dt}$$ .........(8) Equ (8) is the auxiliary time dependent Schrodinger equation
Post a Comment
Read more