Skip to main content

Work done of an expanding gas in vacuum

Before, we start discussing about the work done of an expanding gas, it is advisable to first of all know about the work done of a gas.
The work done of a gas is derived as follows:
Recall: the work done (w) is given as:
$$w = fs$$ ........(1)
Where,
f = force
s = distance

But for a gas; work done (w) is given as:
$$w = pv$$ .........(2)
Where, p = pressure and v = volume

During a change of state the work done is written as:
$$dw=pdv$$
Adding all the change, we have:
$$\int dw = \int_{v_1}^{v_2} pdv$$ .......(3)
But, p = constant
Therefore, equ (3) becomes:
$$w = p \int_{v_1}^{v_2} dv$$ .............(4)
Equ(4) is the work done of the gas.

Expansion of gas
Expansion of gas which is sometimes called "free expansion" is a process in which gas expands into an insulated evacuated chamber.
For real gases,  they experience change in temperature but for ideal gases, there is no change in temperature.
From the equation:
$$p_1v_1 = p_2v_2$$
Where;
p1 = initial pressure
p2 = final pressure
v1 = initial volume
v2 = final volume

When gas expands; $$v_2 > v_1$$ and $$p_2 < p_1$$

Work done of an expanding gas in vacuum:
Recall: From expansion of gas that
$$p_2 < p_1$$
hence,
$$p = 0$$ ...............(7)
From equ(4) substitute equ(7)
$$w = 0 \int_{v_1}^{v_2} dv$$
Hence,
$$w=0$$
Therefore,  the work done for an expanding gas in a vacuum is zero

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Schrodinger equation as a law in physics

The unified theory of wave-particle duality has been used to derive the Schrödinger equations. The Schrodinger equations are generally accepted, by postulate rather than derivation, to be laws of physics. The Schrodinger equations provide a basis for analyzing many kinds of systems (molecular, atomic, and nuclear) in a particular inertial reference frame. The success of the Schrödinger equations constitutes a basis for accepting them, their derivations, and the unified theory of wave-particle duality which makes such derivations possible. This acceptance is completely justified in the favored inertial reference frame. In accord with the principle of relativity, all physical laws must be the same in all inertial reference frames, i.e., all physical laws must be Lorentz invariant. Recall, the relationship: $$\nabla^{2} \psi = \frac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial t^{2}}$$ ...........(1) Equ (1) is Lorentz invariant and reduces, by means of the procedure presented in the previou
Post a Comment
Read more

Maxwell first equation

The Maxwell first equation in electrostatics is called the Gauss law in electrostatics. Statement:  It states that the total electric flux \(\psi_E\) passing through a closed hypothetical surface is equal to \(\frac{1}{\epsilon_0}\) enclosed by the surface. Integral Form: $$\phi_E = \int E.ds = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}$$ $$\int D.ds = q$$ where, $$D = \epsilon_0 E = displacement-vector$$ Let the change be distributed over a volume v and \(\rho\) be the volume charge density. Hence, $$q = \int \rho dv$$ Therefore; $$\int D.ds = \int_{v} \rho dv$$ .........(1) Equ(1) is the integral form of Maxwell first law Differential form: Apply Gauss divergence theorem to the L.H.S of equ(1) from surface integral to volume integral. $$\int D.ds = \int (\nabla.D)dv$$ Substituting this equation to equ(1) $$\int(\nabla.D)dv = \int_{v} \rho dv$$ As two volume integrals are equal only if their integrands are equal. Thus; $$\nabla.D = \rho v$$ ............(2) Equ(2) is the differe
Post a Comment
Read more

Auxiliary time dependent Schrodinger equation

Recall the relationship: $$\phi(t) = C_+ exp[-i(\frac{E}{\hbar})t] + C_- exp[i(\frac{E}{\hbar})t]$$ .............(1) Recall, from the present special case: $$C_+ = 0$$ ........(2) Substitute equ (2) into equ (1), we have that: $$\phi(t) = C_- exp[i(\frac{E}{\hbar})t]$$ .......(3) Also,  recall the relationship: $$\Psi(r,t) = \psi(r) \phi(t)$$ ..........(4) Substitute equ (3) into equ (4): $$\Psi(r,t) = C_- exp \psi (r)  [i(\frac{E}{\hbar})t]$$ ..............(5) Equ (5) can be differentiated with respect to t, and by rearranging we have: $$\Psi(r,t) = -i(\frac{\hbar}{E}) \frac{d \Psi (r, t)}{dt}$$ ..............(6) Recall the relationship: $$-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \nabla^{2} \Psi(r,t) + V(r) \Psi(r,t) = E \Psi(r,t)$$ ...........(7) Substituting equ (6) into the right hand side of equ (7) we have: $$-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \nabla^{2} \Psi(r,t) + V(r) \Psi(r,t) = i\hbar \frac{d \Psi(r,t)}{dt}$$ .........(8) Equ (8) is the auxiliary time dependent Schrodinger equation
Post a Comment
Read more